Exper Chaotic Flow - Abstract Design
Exper Chaotic Flow

  • Random Images

  • Orbital
    Orbital

    Maelstroms
    Maelstroms

    A stitch in Time (Revealed)
    A stitch in Time (Revealed)

    Without You what would I do (Fractal Flame ref. round-100-2-181-1)
    Without You what would I do (Fractal Flame ref. round-100-2-181-1)

  • Spam Blocked

  • Quotes

    Those who travel very slowly may yet make far greater progress, provided they keep always to the straight road, than those who, while they run, forsake it.
    Rene Descartes, Discourse on the Method

    Lo so che parlo perche' parlo ma che non persuadero' nessuno; e questa e' disonesta' - ma la rettorica mi costringe a forza a far cio' - o in altre parole "e' pur necessario che se uno ha addentato una perfida sorba la risputi".
    C. Michelstaedter, La Persuasione e la Rettorica

    SOCRATES: Eh! What can be feared when one is doing one’s duty? I know the rage of my enemies. I know all their slanders; but when one only tries to do good to men and when one does not offend heaven, one can fear nothing, neither during life, nor after death.
    Voltaire, Socrates, ACT II

    • «
    »

    Free Burma (ibiscus)

    5th October 2007

    A red photo I took in support of Burma’s people.

    Free Burma (ibiscus)
    Free Burma (ibiscus)

    This entry was posted on Friday, October 5th, 2007 at 13:26 and is filed under Photos, Objector.
    Tags: , , , ,
    You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
    You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

    Share this Post
    • email
    • Add to favorites
    • Print
    • Facebook
    • MySpace
    • Twitter
    • StumbleUpon
    • Digg
    • del.icio.us
    • Google Bookmarks
    • Technorati
    • Netvibes
    • Reddit
    • Yahoo! Bookmarks
    • Yahoo! Buzz
    • Live
    • MSN Reporter
    • Ping.fm

    2 Responses to “Free Burma (ibiscus)”

    1. runnerfrog Says:
      7 October 2007 at 15:28

      The accomplishment of the first shot is showing the sky behind, I think. But in the second one, the bug is too bright to represent accurately the figure of Than Shwe. The comment opinion, of course, runs under my responsibility.

    2. Exper Says:
      8 October 2007 at 11:54

      Yes, the accomplishment of the first shot was showing a red-thing and the sky behind it.
      The second one wasn’t related to the first one in any manner; it was just a naturalistic picture.
      I’ll split the post in two different ones and I’ll add a short comment, sorry for the confusion and the misunderstanding.

    Leave a Reply

    «
    »